Sri Madhwavijaya Fifteenth Sarga (140)
ಶ್ರೀ ಮಧ್ವವಿಜಯ – 15ನೇ ಸರ್ಗ
(140).
AupAdhikO(s)sya bhEdashchEt
satyO(s)satyaha swiduchyatAm|
Tadwayam chOktadOSham hi
mAyivanmA vadEt param||21||
ಔಪಾಧಿಕೋsಸ್ಯ ಭೇದಶ್ಚೇತ್ ಸತ್ಯೋsಸತ್ಯಃ ಸ್ವಿದುಚ್ಯತಾಮ್|
ತದ್ದ್ವಯಂ ಚೋಕ್ತದೋಷಂ ಹಿ ಮಾಯಿವನ್ಮಾವದೇತ್ ಪರಮ್||21||
औपाधिकॊsस्य भॆदश्चॆत् सत्यॊsसत्यः स्विदुच्यताम्।
तद्द्वयं चॊक्तदॊषं हि मायिवन्मावदॆत् परम्॥21
SUMMARY: If the inherent qualities are treated as
separate and interconnected (Samavayaha), then please let us know whether their
adjectives (Aupadhikaha) are to be perceived as true or false? They will both
suffer from the above mentioned defect. It cannot be taken as a separate
doctrine like the doctrine of Illusion.
When all the qualities of the
Lord are treated as one and same or as synonyms, as extended adjectives, then
the fallacy of describing the Lord as possessing multiple skills, qualities,
knowledge becomes ambiguous, paradoxical and hence untenable. The Lord has all
the knowledge, all the qualities and is the origin of all qualities and
knowledge. However, he is not ‘affected’ by positive or negative qualities.
BrooyuraupAdhikam bhEdam
jnAnAdeenAm yadAtmanaha|
NeetyA(s)nayA tannirAsAt syAt
tasyAnantadharmatA||22||
ಬ್ರೂಯುರೌಪಾಧಿಕಂ ಭೇದಂ ಜ್ಞಾನಾದೀನಾಂ ಯದಾತ್ಮನಃ|
ನೀತ್ಯಾsನಯಾ ತನ್ನಿರಾಸಾತ್ ಸ್ಯಾತ್
ತಸ್ಯಾನಂತಧರ್ಮತಾ||22||
ब्रूयुरौपाधिकं भॆदं ज्ञानादीनां यदात्मनः।
नीत्याsनया तन्निरासात् स्यात्
तस्यानन्तधर्मता॥22॥
SUMMARY: The distinction between the Lord and his
knowledge and qualities expounded in the doctrine of Illusion also suffers from
the same fallacy as stated above and hence gets ruled out as unsustainable and
incongruous. Thus, it is conclusively established that the Almighty is
Omniscient, and Omnipotent.
What this stanza further elaborates is that it is
unacceptable to treat the Soul and the inherent qualities as separate from each
other. Lord Vishnu cannot be perceived as different from the qualities that he
is described with. It should also be understood with all conviction, faith,
belief and unsuspecting commitment that the Lord and the Souls of other beings,
including those of all other deities, are one and the same.
GuNAdibhEdE
sambandamavEkShyApyanavasthitEhe|
VishEShamAtrENAnantyam guNAnAm
shObhatE vibhOho||23||
ಗುಣಾದಿಭೇದೇ ಸಂಬಂಧಮಪೇಕ್ಷ್ಯಾಪ್ಯನವಸ್ಥಿತೇಃ|
ವಿಶೇಷಮಾತ್ರೇಣಾನಂತ್ಯಂ ಗುಣಾನಾಂ ಶೋಭತೇ ವಿಭೋಃ||23||
गुणादिभॆदॆ संबंधमपॆक्ष्याप्यनवस्थितॆः।
विशॆषमात्रॆणानन्त्यं गुणानां शॊभतॆ विभॊः॥23॥
SUMMARY: If the differences among the unlimitied or
infinite qualities of Lord Vishnu are accepted, then the fallacy of
unsustainability occurs while attempting to establish the relationship and the
differences between the Lord and his infinite qualities. Since the management
of differences among the infinite qualities of the Lord is accepted, it is
clear that the Lord is an embodiment of infinite, inexorable qualities.
The system of Pluralistic Realism or Vaisheshika
school of philosophy, which is also referred to as atomism, say that the
differences between organs, qualities, action and the person related to that
action, persons of different castes and between the various daily-use goods is
Samavaya or universal or one and the same, which has been negated in this
stanza.
Please visit https://www.facebook.com/dwarakanath.shimoga
Please read,
comment and share. SDN