Thursday, 18 October 2018
Wednesday, 17 October 2018
SRI MADHWAVIJAYA - TRITEEYAHA SARGAHA SHLOKAS 28, 29 AND 30
(Eloquence
of Madhyageha, discussion about the word “Likucha” have been provided in these
three stanzas. Please read, comment and share. SDN)
KaThayatAm
praThamE kaThayatyalam swajanakE janasanGhavrutE kaThAm|
SalalOkamanOnayanOtsavashchaturaDheehi
sa kadAchidavAchayat|28||
SUMMARY:
When his father, who was in the forefront of Puraniks, was delivering a
discourse to an assemblage, ever sharp Vasudeva, who was a pleasure to the mind
and sight of people, entreated his father to explain further.
Vasudeva
had noticed that his father had failed to substantiate a stanza and made him
explain it later.
ViviDhashAKhipadArThanivEdanE
likuchanAmnitadA(a)nuditArThakE|
Kimiti
tAta tadarThamavarNayan kaThayaseeti shanairayamabraveet||29||
SUMMARY:
In the context under reference, Madhyageha was supposed to tell the names of
various trees. Taking cognisance of the fact that his father had skipped a
stanza, Vasudeva whispered in a low voice to his father, “why are you
proceeding with explanation without telling the meaning of one stanza.
Scholars
are of the view that the context might be related to an incident in the Canto
28, Sabhaparva of Mahabharata where
Dwaraka is explained. The names of trees might be: AmrAha panasavrukshAshcha ankOlAstilatindukAha|
LikuchAmrAtakAshchaishcha kSheerikA kanTakee taThA||
Another
important fact is that Sri Trivikrama Pandit, who composed Sri Vayustuti, and
his son Narayana Pandit, who is the author of this “Madhwavijaya” belonged to a
family named asLikucha.
Avadateeti
pitaryapi chOditE pratibuBhutsuShu tatra janEShwapi|
Ayamudeerya
tadarThamavAptavAn pariShadO hyasamAnasumAnanAm||30||
SUMMARY:
When his father did not explain the stanza that Vasudeva had drawn his
attention to, the audience insisted on an explanation. Vasudeva surprised
everyone there with his explanation and therefore he got felicitated.
Monday, 15 October 2018
SRI RAMACHARITRA MANJARI
(In this edition, the efforts
that Vishwamitra continued to put in to attain the status of Brahma Rishi have
been explained. Please read, comment and share. SDN)
In the meantime, Trishanku, a
king and descendent of the dynasty of Ikshwaku, had a desire to physically
enter the heavens. He appealed to sage Vasishtha to perform a sacrifice to get
his desire realised. Sage Vasishtha told Trishanku that it was impossible to
get into the heavens in the mortal form and that there was no sacrifice that
could transform his dream into reality. He went to the children of Sage
Vasishtha and raised the same issue with them. When they too rejected his plea,
Trishanku said that he would get such a sacrifice performed from different
Rishis. Enraged by this statement, the children of Vasishtha cursed Trishanku
to become insane and transform into a Chandala. Wearing the same form of
Chandala, Trishanku went to Vishwamitra and narrated the entire story.
Vishwamitra performed the sacrifice and Trishanku reached the heavens. But,
Lord Indra pushed Trishanku down. Infuriated by this act of Indra, sage
Vishwamitra stopped Trishanku, who was
falling with his head down, midway, with the power of his penance. He began
creating all the planets, other heavenly bodies. He created some stars in the
sky. Frightened by what was happening around, the deities bestowed upon
Trishanku the blessing that he could enjoy the same pleasure as the one
available in the heavens. They also conceded that Trishanku be able to enjoy the
new heavens with his head down and toe up. Because of this Trishanku incident, Vishwamitra
had to lose a large portion of the power penance.
Vishwamitra again indulged in penance at
Pushkarateerth. At this juncture, Indra stole away the sacrificial horse that the
then Ayodhya King Ambareesha had begun. The priests categorically said that so
long as the missing sacrificial was not brought, the sacrifice could not be completed.
The priests also suggested a solution for the situation. If a human being could
be offered as sacrifice, it could be completed, the priests said. Although the
search was made in all directions, the sacrificial horse could not be found. As
an alternative, one lakh cows were given to Rucheeka Maharishi in exchange for
the second son of Rucheeka Maharishi, called Shunashshepa. While he was being
taken for the sacrifice, Shunashshepa saw Vishwamitra at the Pushkara and he
sought protection with Vishwamitra. Sage Vishwamitra summoned all children and
ordered them to go and sacrifice their lives. The children directly refused to
obey the orders of Vishwamitra. Enraged by his sons’ disobedience, Vishwamitra
cursed them to become Chandalas. He then preached two Mantras and asked
Shunashshepa to recite them. The deities were impressed with the recitation of
Mantra by Shunashshepa and agreed to have the sacrifice completed without
sacrificing any animal or human. This again reduced the power of penance for
Vishwamitra. Saturday, 13 October 2018
SRI MADHWAVIJAYA - TRUTEEYAHA SARGAHA SHLOKAS 25,26 AND 27
SRI
MADHWAVIJAYA – TRUTEEYAHA SARGAHA SHLO
KAS 25, 26 AND 27
(Vasudeva
delivers maiden spiritual discourse and displays his dexterity in translating
Scriptures. Please read, comment and share. SDN)
ATha kaTham
kaThayEti tadA janE gaditavatyuchitArThamudAharat|
Sa samalAlyata
vismayiBhirnarairapi surairvijayAnkurapUjakaihi||25||
SUMMARY: Then,
with the audience there requesting him “Dear child, can you please substantiate
it for us?” Vasudeva explained the correct meaning of the text. The puzzled audience
honoured the boy. Deities too worshipped him as it marked the sprouting of a
great tree of glory.
This incident is
said to be the beginning of a task undertaken by Sri Madhwacharya of condemning
the misconception and misleading versions of Scriptures by the proponents of
different cults.
Sa jananeesahitO
janakam gruhE pragatavAmstamudantamavEdayat|
Nigada tAta
Shivaha kaThakaha sa kim vitaThageeraThavA(a)hamiteerayan||26||
Vasudeva, who
returned home along with his mother, narrated the incident to his father and
asked him “Oh father, please tell me whether it was I or that Shivabhatta who
misinterpreted the holy text?”
Nanu
sutAvitaTham kaThitaha twayEtyamumudeerya savismayamasmarat|
Prakrutitaha
krutitA Khalu mE shshOrmadaDhinAThadayOdayajEtyasau||27||
SUMMARY: Bewildered
Madhyageha said “my child, you have not said anything wrong” and said within
himself “this natural skill of my son is nothing but the grace of my deity Sri
Ananteshwara”.
Wednesday, 10 October 2018
SRI RAMACHARITRA MANJARI
(In this edition, transformation
of Vishwamitra from being Kshatriya into a Brahmin is explained. Please read,
comment and share. SDN)
The substantiation about the distinction
between the body of Lord Sri Rama and the bodies of Lakshmana, Bharata and and
Shatrughna has been indicated in the word “PrajAtaha” in which the syllable “JA”
means one who took the incarnation well. The letter “pra” in the original
expression further points to “PrAdurBhUtaha”.
Readers may be wondering at the
length of this explanation for the first stanza of Ramacharitrya Manjari.
Unless all this explanation is given, the hidden meaning of the stanza will
remain lost and therefore, late Sri P.P. Lakshminarayana Upadhyaya has provided
this great insight into the story to make the work of Sri Raghavendra Swamy a
very comprehensive one.
In this first stanza, Sri
Raghavendra Rayaru has said: “NeetO VishwAmitrENa mantrAhruedanusanjAta…”,
which can be written in direct or prose style as : “Atha VishwAmitrENa
anujasahitaha neetaha”, which is further elaborated as: “TadA VishwAmitraha
RAmAvatAram shrutwA DasharaThagruham prAptavAn| Atha RAmaha DasharaThEna
anujnAtaha salakkshmaNaha VishwAmitrENa neeyamAnaha| This means: Then, having
learnt about the incarnation of Vishnu as Sri Rama, sage Vishwamitra reached
the palace of Dasharatha. Later, Sri Rama secured the direction from Dasharatha
to accompany sage Vishwamitra, along with his younger brother Lakshmana.
This simple statement projects us
to explore and know something more about sage Vishwamitra.
In the dynasty of Moon
(Chandravamsha) was born a king named Gadhi. Due to the blessings and grace of his
son-in-law Rucheeka, a Rishi, a son called Vishwamitra was born to Gadhi. Being
a very strong king, Vishwamitra went on a glorious expedition and reached the
Ashram of Vasishtha during the course of that expedition. Sage Vasishtha, with
the assistance of Kamadhenu, a celestial cow, hosted a very good party to
Vishwamitra and his huge army. Having come to know the extraordinary and mystic
power of Kamadhenu, Vishwamitra forced sage Vasishtha to part with it. When
Vasishtha refused, Vishwamitra stole Kamadhenu, which produced an army with its
divine power and crushed the entire army of Vishwamitra. The army produced by
Kamadhenu also destroyed the one hundred children of Vishwamitra. Vanquished
Vishwamitra did a fierce penance to invoke Lord Rudra and secured Brahmastra
and other lethal Astras from the Lord. Vishwamitra fired those Astras at
Vasishtha, who transferred the power of his penance into a club and placed it
in front of himself. The club destroyed all the Astras fired by Vishwamitra.
Realising that the power of a Brahmin is greater, Vishwamitra did a penance for
one thousand years in praise of Lord Brahma, seeking to be converted into a
Brahmin. Lord Brahma, who appeared in front of Vishwamitra, just said “You have
become a Rajarishi”. Realising that he had not yet attained Brahminhood,
dissatisfied Vishwamitra again did penance.
(To be continued)
Monday, 8 October 2018
SRI MADHWAVIJAYA - TRUTEEYAHA SARGAHA SHLOKAS 22, 23 AND 24
(In
these stanzas, the spiritual discourse of a scholar named Shivabhatta has been
explained. Please read, comment and share. SDN)
ParishadA nitarAm parivAritaha
shivapadaha kila dhautapaTOdBhavaha|
Iha kaThAm kaThayan dadrushE tataha
pruThudiyA pruThukAkrutinA(a)munA||22||
SUMMARY: Vasudeva, a fully learned boy
by birth (Poornabodha) saw a Puranik named Shiva, who belonged to a dynasty
called Dhautapata, giving a discourse, even as he was surrounded by a large
assemblage of audience.
IdamuvAcha vichAvichakShaNaha
shuchivachaha shanakaihi sa janAntarE|
AparaThA kaThitam kaThaka twayA nanu
matAnmahatAmiti sasmitam||23||
SUMMARY: Being an exponent of sensible
spiritual knowledge, Vasudeva said in a soft voice and a sweet smile from the
midst of the audience, “Oh Puranik, whatever you have told isn’t as per the
opinion of elderly people.”
Scholars are of the opinion in this
context that the subject of discourse being presented by Shivabhatta then was
probably related to some difficult instances from epics like the killing of
Vali, incident of Shambuka, desertion of Seeta by Sri Rama or acceptance of
five husbands by Draupadi. The presentation of Shivabhatta was perhaps not in
accordance with what Sri Vyasa or Shukamuni had already dealt with. The view
expressed by Vasudeva also conveys the meaning that mere popular presentation
of a discourse is not enough. It should be presented in a way to please Lord
Janardhana. There is a message behind this act of Vasudeva that whenever a
person utters something during the course of a discourse that is not in line
with the established truth, the audience is duty bound to oppose and object.
AgaNayanna shivam janatA tadA savachanE
vasudEvasutAhwayE|
MuKharamichChati kO mrugaDhUrtakam
prakrutahumkrutasihmashishau sati||24||
SUMMARY: As soon as Vasudeva said those
words, the audience began ignoring the discourse. Who would pay attention to the
barks of a fox when the cub of a lion unleashes a roar?
Thursday, 4 October 2018
SRI MADHWAVIJAYA - TRUTEEYAHA SARGAHA SHLOKAS 19, 20 AND 21
(Father
gets surprised by the grasping power of Vasudeva. Please read, comment and
share. SDN)
Lipikulam nanu tAta gate dinE
liKhitamEva punarliKhitam kutaha|
It nijapratiBhAguNaBhAvitam haripadasya
vachastamanandayat||19||
SUMMARY: The words “Father, why have you
written the same alphabets that you wrote yesterday” of Vasudeva earned the
admiration of Madhyageha Bhattaru.
It can be understood here that
Madhyageha was still unaware that his son Vasudeva was an incarnation of Lord
Vayu.
Shishurasau pratiBhAmbuDhirityalam
janamanOvachanagrahapeeDanA|
Na BhavatAditi tam vijanasThalE
swatanayam samashikShayadEShakaha||20||
SUMMARY: Realising that “this child of
mine is an ocean of talent and the devilish impact of the mind and tongue of
evil minded people shall not fall on him,”
Madhyageha began teaching his son in a place of tranquillity and
loneliness.
Madhyageha was perhaps aware that the
words of jealous people could have a negative impact on the child’s growth.
MahavatA swajanEna
sameeritaswajananeesahitEna kadAchana|
RuchiravAchanayA(a)rchitavAkChriyA
pratiyayE praBhuNA Ghrutavallyapi||21||
SUMMARY: Vasudeva, an affluent person of
sweet words with which the speech was getting honoured, went to Ghruvalli,
along with his mother and as per the wishes of his near and dear.
It is said that it has been mentioned in
Bhavaprakashike that Ghrutavalli was a different name of a village called Neyampalli.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)