SRI MADHWAVIJAYA – CHATURTHAHA SARGAHA
SHOLKAS 19 TO 22
(In
these stanzas, Sri Madhygeha expresses his wrath, unwillingness over Vasudeva’s decision to become a saint. Please read,
comment and share. SDN)
Sa
chintayan putramanOraTham shuchA punashchateertvOpagatO mahAnadeem|
YateeshwarAnuvratamAtmanandanam
tamaikShata grAmavarE maThAntarE||19||
SUMMARY:
Depressed by his son’s longing to embrace sainthood, heart-broken Madhyageha
crossed Netravati River, reached the Kutyadi Mutt at a place called Karyuru
where his son had gone behind Achyutapreksha and saw him (son) there.
During
his sojourn, Achyutapreksha was staying at the Kutyadi Mutt on the banks of
Netravati River. Vasudeva had accompanied his Guru.
As
per Bhava Prakashika, “Gramavarasya ‘KAryUru” ityapaBhraShTaBhAShA”, which
means, Gramavara is another name of Karyuru.
Sri
Vyasanakere Prabhanjanacharya quotes a statement from a commentary rendered by
Sri Vijayadhwajeeya Tirtharu: “Prateechee MahAnadee nAmnA NEtrAvatee| VarAha
kShEtrAt sahyagirim BhitwA Pashchimasamudram syandamAnA| It is also stated that
according to Bhagavata Purana, Netravati River was being called as Mahanadi.
Na
jAtakOpAkulitO DharAsurO mahAtmanAm lanGhanaBheerurapyalam|
Sutasya
kaupeenaDhrutau hi sAhasaprashravO mE druDha ityaBhAShata||20||
SUMMARY:
Enraged and infuriated Madhyageha, who would never go against the wishes of
elders, said in a fit of rage that if his son were to wear pudenda (Kaupeena)
and become a saint, he would certainly take a bold step.
“Bold
step” or “SAhasaprashravO mE DruDha” means that he (Madhyageha) would either
launch indefinite fast or sacrifice his life, if his son were to become a saint.
KShaNEna
kaupeenaDharO nijam paTam vidArya hE tAta kuruShwa sAhasam|
IteemamuktwA
praBhurabraveet punaha shuBhAntarAyam na BhavAmshcharEditi||21||
Na
putra pitrOravanam vinA shuBham vadanti sanatO nanu tau sutau mrutau|
NivartamAnE
na hi pAlakO(a)sti nau twayeeti vaktAramamum sutO(a)braveet||22||
SUMMARY:
Sri Vasudeva immediately removed the clothe with which he had covered his
chest, tore it and wore it as pudenda; he then challenged his father by saying “Alright
my father, let us see what sort of
daring act would you take,” and again said “it isn’t proper on your part to
obstruct a noble deed.”
Sri
Vyasanakere Prabhanjanacharya is of the view that Sri Vasudeva challenged his
father to sacrifice his life only to indicate that he (father) could not
sacrifice his life when he (Mukhyaprana in the form of young Vasudeva) was
there. No being can sacrifice the Prana or life till as long as Mukhyaprana
stays in the body. Once Mukhyaprana exits, the body becomes a corpse.
No comments:
Post a Comment