(In
these Shlokas, Sri Narayana Panditacharyaru has described the circumstances in
which Sankara emerged and established his philosophy. Please read, comment and
share. SDN)
JanO
namEnnAparaThEti matvA shaThashchaturThAshramamESha BhEjE|
PadmAkaraha
vA kaluSheechikeerShuhu sudurdamO duShTagajO vishudhDham||49||
Thinking
that people might not surrender or follow him, he got ordained into sainthood,
like an uncontrolled elephant dashing into a lotus-covered pond with the
intention of stirring the slush underneath.
Avaidikam
mADhyamikam nirastam nireekShya tatpakShasupakShapAtee|
TamEva
pakSham pratipAdukO(a)sau nyarUrupanmArgamihAnurUpam||50||
SUMMARY:
Conceiving that the anti-Vedic Buddhism was gaining popularity, he hatched a
conspiracy that was suitable for the situation as he too had faith in that
philosophy and wanted to promote the same.
The
poet explores the conditions that prevailed during the life time of Sankara.
There is a clue that Buddhism had become popular but at the same time, it was
losing ground. The demons wanted a similar situation to spread anti-Hari
philosophy.
AsatpadE(a)san
sadasadviviktam mAyAKhyayA samvrutimaBhyaDhatta|
BrahmApyaKhanDam
bata shUnyasidhDhai prachChannabaudhDhO(a)yamataha prasidhDhaha||51||
Being
wicked and ill-motivated, he altered the concept of “Asat” in Buddhism with
“SadasadvilakShana” (Vilakshana or perversion of sat or truth and asat or
untruth) and “Samvruti” with “Maye” or mysticism. With a view to establish “Shoonyatwa”
or obscurism, he called Brahma as “AkhanDa” and came to be known as “PrachChannabudhDha”
or disguised BudhDhist.
It
is to be noted here that Sri Madhwacharya has clearly mentioned in his
Tattvodyota, Tatvanirnaya, Anuvyakhyana, Gita Tatparya and other works that
there is not much difference between Budhdhism and Mysticism.
Referring
to Sankara in his Discovery of India, Jwaharlal Nehru has stated:
“Some
of his (Sankara’s” Brahmin opponents called him a disguised Buddhist; it is
true Buddhism had influenced him considerably” (Excerpt from Dr. Vyasanakere
Prabhanjanacharya’s compilation of “Sumadhwavijaya” page 40 footnote).
No comments:
Post a Comment