Sri Madhwavijaya Fifteenth Sarga (140)
ಶ್ರೀ ಮಧ್ವವಿಜಯ – 15ನೇ ಸರ್ಗ
(140).
Vimatam kAraNam na syAdastwAnna yadeedrusham|
NEdrusham tadyathA kumbhakartEtyatrAnumeeyatE||28||
ವಿಮತಂ ಕಾರಣಂ ಸ್ಯಾದಸತ್ತ್ವಾನ್ನ ಯದೀದೃಶಂ|
ನೇದೃಶಂ ತದ್ಯಥಾ ಕುಂಭಕರ್ತೇತ್ಯತ್ರಾನುಮೀಯತೇ||28||
विमतं कारणं स्यादस्त्त्वान्न यदीदृशम्। नॆदृशं
तद्यथा कुम्भकर्तॆत्यत्रानुमीयतॆ॥28॥
SUMMARY: Other cults prophessing vacuum cannot be
the cause of Universe. Since it is untrue, there should be some reason, after
all. Like the proposition or inference of Kumbhakara or the potter, the contention
of blankness is non-tenable.
Here is the rejection of the philosophy that
preaches ‘blankness’ or Shunyavada. Asat or non-existant cannot be accepted
because it cannot prove anything as the cause or consequence of for the existence
of the Universe.
AnghO tApasa nO shUnyam kAraNam kumbhakartruvat|
Yatsamvrutyutthitam vishwam
tatkkAraNamiteeryatE||29||
ಅಂಘೋ ತಾಪಸ ನೋ ಶೂನ್ಯಂ ಕಾರಣಂ ಕುಂಭಕರ್ತೃವತ್|
ಯತ್ಸಂವೃತ್ಯುತ್ಥಿತಂ ವಿಶ್ವಂ ತತ್ಕಾರಣಮಿತೀರ್ಯತೇ||29||
अन्घॊ तापस नॊ शून्यं कारणं कुम्भकर्तृवत्।
यत्सम्वृत्युत्थितं विश्वं तत्कारणमितीर्यतॆ॥29॥
YEvam chEt kAraNam mA smabraveehi shUnyam
kathanchana|
AyuShmastadadhiShThAnam vyutpitsaswagurOrgruhE||30||
ಏವಂ ಚೇತ್ ಕಾರಣಂ ಮಾ ಸ್ಮ ಬ್ರವೀಃ ಶೂನ್ಯಂ ಕಥಂಚನ|
ಆಯುಷ್ಮಂಸ್ತದಧಿಷ್ಠಾನ0 ವ್ಯುತ್ಪಿತ್ಸಸ್ವಗುರೋರ್ಗೃಹೇ||30||
ऎवं चॆत् कारणं मा स्म ब्रवीः शून्यं कथंचन।
आयुष्मम्स्तदधिष्ठानं व्युत्पित्सस्वगुरॊर्गृहॆ॥30॥
SUMMARY: Oh ascetic! If you were to tell that ‘we
are not saying that the cause of universe is like the potter but that whatever
the Universe we see with the lack of knowledge of blankness is in fact the cause’,
then you cannot contend that blankness is the cause.’ Oh Ayushmant! try to
understand more clearly what you have learnt in Gurukula that blankness is just
a spot, a place or a platform.
Some Buddhist thinkers contend that the concept or
the principle of Blankness or emptiness is not to say that blankness is the
cause of universe but due to the lack of that knowledge, the universe is seen.
However, Shoonya or the blankness is not the whole; it is just a spot or a tiny
spot in the ‘whole’ and hence it cannot be attributed to be the reason for the
universe. There is a huge difference between blankness and the whole and both
these concepts need separate defition. They can never be synonymous.
Please
visit https://www.facebook.com/dwarakanath.shimoga
Please read, comment and share. SDN
